Without Form and Void: A Study of the Meaning of Genesis [Arthur C. Custance] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Without Form and Void has 6 ratings and 1 review. Arthur C. Custance Author Arthur Custance wrote his book “Without Form and Void” to argue that. “Without Form And Void: A Study of the Meaning of Genesis ” by – Arthur C. Custance – ISBN: , Classic Reprint Press.

Author: Vular Tygozuru
Country: Bosnia & Herzegovina
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Politics
Published (Last): 26 May 2008
Pages: 421
PDF File Size: 17.41 Mb
ePub File Size: 6.36 Mb
ISBN: 627-4-89328-306-1
Downloads: 81632
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Kezahn

Liddell and Scott give the meaning in Classical Greek as ‘adjust’, or ‘put in order again’, or ‘restore’.

But not all who reject the “Gap Theory” are as openly indifferent to the grounds upon which it is based. This angelic Being and. InJames Hutton – published in Edinburgh his.

Yet, for some strange reason, it is still identified by many modern writers as a recent invention, without linguistic or exegetical support in Cuetance, and never favoured by any scholar with a reputation! For man must have been created soon enough after the event to observe at least some of the evidence which time has since eroded away. Admittedly it is at times evanescent and occasionally ambiguous, and admittedly the fanciful methods of interpreting Scripture adopted by the Jewish Commentators and often emulated by the early Church Fathers do not exactly encourage one to seek for solid factual information in their writings, yet at other times they are quite explicit in their present- ations.

Their condition is also described as a state of confusion and. Christian exposition of the Old Testament.

Perhaps he thought it was obvious. Yet he feels that there is no justification whatever to adopt what he calls “the restitution hy- pothesis” which assumes that “the Chaos was the consequence of a derangement connected with the fall of the angels and that the six days’ creation was the restoration of a new world from the ruin of the old”. Now, any one of these pointers taken alone might carry little weight.


The Mosaic history of creation proceeded from revelation; and since knowledge of salvation, and generally, knowledge of the coid, has endured subsequent ans Moses for a period of thirty centuries, we are certainly in a position to read things which transcended the intelligence of Moses, between the lines of the Mosaic history of creation” emphasis mine.

Whereas verse 2 proceeds to tell how that custsnce earth, at some uncertain time, had undergone some remarkable change. He made several other worlds before ours, but He destroyed them all, anx He was pleased with none until He created ours. The usual view is that when geologists “proved” the earth to.

Without Form and Void: A Study of the Meaning of Genesis 1:2

They had no knowledge of working evil or wickedness, but. Indeed, on Skinner’s own argument it is not merely admissible but highly prob- able!

Two centuries later, Thomas Aquinas reiterated this view when he wrote: Two centuries later, Thomas Aquinas reiterated this. In this work he sets forth a number of reasons why he believed Gen. This collocation is the more remarkable in that. And as to the length of the Intervening period before the earth was.

The Book of Genesisthat it was “exegetically admissible”. Furthermore, in the Massoretic Text abd which the Jewish scholars. What is, I think, quite clear is that. Victor was a Flemish scholar and a member.

It would appear that by this time the view of such a. Driver reached on exegetical grounds – viz. Creation occurred B. The only way this can be done is by a study of the text itself They might very probably foem assented to his chronology as applied to the creation of Adam but they would have set the creation of the Universe the heavens and the earth further back in time by some unstated amount.


Without Form and Void: A Study of the Meaning of Genesis – Arthur C. Custance – Google Books

Meanings of Hayah Followed by Lamedh. The writings of Moses do not fix the. First of all, he deals strictly with the questions of grammar and syntax, and writes: Custance contends that we should not allow science to determine what Scripture says. Neither should we allow Scripture for determine what the scientist observes in the laboratory.

Without Form and Void – Chapter 1

Admittedly not a very clear account, but at least one. When Barcochebas rebelled against the Romans, Akiba. But whether the earth’s “state of alien.

Books by Arthur C. Thus was initiated a trend in certain Christian quarters which increasingly laid emphasis on what is now so often disparagingly referred to as the “Gap Theory”. They may have seen it as fogm quite a short.

It is a rare thing nowadays to find in a scholarly work on Genesis any acknowledgment of the fact that there is evidence of a discontinuity between the cutance two verses of Chapter One and that this was ever recognized by commentators until modern Geology arose to challenge the Mosaic cosmogony.